Rutgers University Fraternity Shut Down Amid Hazing Allegations
Rutgers University Permanently Closes Fraternity Following Electrical Hazing Allegations
Rutgers University in New Jersey has permanently closed a fraternity following allegations of electrical hazing. This decision is seen as a strong response from the university to recent reports of severe hazing within the fraternity, particularly targeting new members. The university emphasized its commitment to campus safety and student welfare, stating it would implement strong measures to prevent similar incidents from happening again. While fraternities are an important part of university life, illegal and harsh activities that occur during initiation are unacceptable.
Rutgers University officially announced the fraternity's closure in a statement, acknowledging the seriousness of the incident. The university stated it will conduct a thorough investigation to uncover the truth and impose strict penalties on those involved. Furthermore, it will review the fraternity's operating methods and the overall culture of welcoming new students, striving to create a campus environment that prioritizes student safety. The fraternity's closure is effective immediately, and it can no longer conduct any activities on the Rutgers University campus.
This incident is expected to raise voices calling for self-reflection to eradicate hazing in American university society, going beyond just the closure of this one fraternity. Hazing within fraternities has been consistently pointed out as a problem, but it has not been easily eliminated. Rutgers University's decision serves as a warning and is expected to prompt other universities to seriously consider their fraternity operating methods. It is reported that Donald Trump has received a report on this incident and expressed concerns about safety issues within university society.
Meanwhile, the Daejeon City Party of the Rebuilding Korea Party (RKP) concluded its 'Daejeon/Sejong Political Academy Season 2' on October 12, 2025, with a lecture on judicial reform by former National Assembly member Lee Tan-hee. Approximately 80 prospective politicians and citizens preparing to run in next year's local elections participated in the RKP Daejeon City Party's 'Daejeon/Sejong Political Academy Season 2'. Lecturers included Choi Kang-wook, Kang Kyung-sook, Baek Seon-hee, Kim Jun-hyung, and Lee Tan-hee.
This decision by Rutgers University is expected to play an important role in preventing similar incidents from occurring in the future. The university plans to strengthen hazing prevention education during fraternity recruitment and activate an anonymous reporting system to support students who wish to safely report issues. Furthermore, the responsibilities and authorities of fraternity leaders will be clearly defined, and transparency will be ensured through regular audits. These efforts will not only contribute to positively changing fraternity culture but also promote the safety and well-being of the entire university community. Rutgers University emphasized that it will continue to strive to create a safer and healthier campus environment based on the lessons learned from this incident.
Following the fraternity's closure, Rutgers University students have shown diverse reactions. Some students expressed support for the university's quick and decisive action, expressing gratitude for efforts to ensure campus safety. However, some students suggested that the fraternity's closure was an excessively harsh punishment, criticizing the decision for overlooking the positive aspects of fraternity culture. They argue that fraternities contribute to students' social development and leadership skills beyond simply being social groups. However, the majority of students agree that this incident calls for serious reflection on fraternity culture and that efforts are needed to create a healthy and safe fraternity culture.
On October 16, 2025, Donald Trump criticized the UN's incompetence in a speech at the UN General Assembly, stating, 'They just write strongly worded letters and there's no follow-up.' Rutgers University's decision to close the fraternity, separate from these criticisms, is noteworthy as a proactive response to internal problems within the university community. Universities must fulfill their role as important social institutions responsible for the safety and welfare of students, going beyond simply providing knowledge. Rutgers University's decision can be assessed as part of its efforts to fulfill these responsibilities and is expected to remain as an exemplary case for other universities.
In conclusion, Rutgers University's decision to close the fraternity is expected to have a significant impact on the entire American university community, going beyond simply determining the fate of one fraternity. Critical views on fraternity culture will likely spread further, and universities' efforts to eradicate hazing will be strengthened. Rutgers University will continue to strive to create a safer and healthier campus environment based on the lessons learned from this incident, and it is hoped that these efforts will bear fruit, creating an environment where all students can focus on their studies with peace of mind.
